Volume 2, Issue 4 (October 2023)
Health Science Monitor 2023, 2(4): 273-281 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Moutab Sahihazar Z, Ghahramani A, Galvani S, Hajaghazadeh M. Investigating the mortality risk of silicosis and lung cancer in foundry workers. Health Science Monitor 2023; 2 (4) :273-281
URL: http://hsm.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-131-en.html
URL: http://hsm.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-131-en.html
Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
Abstract: (774 Views)
Background & Aims: The correlation between silicosis and elevated susceptibility to lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and autoimmune disorders is well-established. Hence, it is imperative to thoroughly analyze the potential health risks posed by exposure to crystalline silica within the foundry industry. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the mortality rate associated with silicosis and lung cancer among workers in a foundry industry located in Urmia city in 2021.
Materials & Methods: The concentration of crystalline silica in the air was determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) in accordance with NIOSH 7602. Estimating the excess lifetime risk of mortality and rate of silicosis-related mortality was performed using Rice et al. and Mannetje et al. models.
Results: The average concentration of crystalline silica in six occupational groups ranged from 0.029 to 0.064 mg.m-3. Among the six occupational groups studied, sand preparation workers were the most exposed to crystalline silica. According to the model of Mannetje et al., the cumulative exposure of 87% of people exposed to crystalline silica is in the range of 0 to 0.99, which indicates the death of one person per thousand people. Also, in this industry, the risk of dying from lung cancer was 15 per thousand people.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that the average concentration of crystalline silica in all occupational groups exceeded the permissible occupational exposure limit of 0.025 mg.m-3 recommended by the Occupational Health Committee of Iran. Additionally, the estimated risk of death due to silicosis and lung cancer is also higher than the acceptable risk level. Therefore, the implementation of control measures against exposure to silica is highly recommended.
Materials & Methods: The concentration of crystalline silica in the air was determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) in accordance with NIOSH 7602. Estimating the excess lifetime risk of mortality and rate of silicosis-related mortality was performed using Rice et al. and Mannetje et al. models.
Results: The average concentration of crystalline silica in six occupational groups ranged from 0.029 to 0.064 mg.m-3. Among the six occupational groups studied, sand preparation workers were the most exposed to crystalline silica. According to the model of Mannetje et al., the cumulative exposure of 87% of people exposed to crystalline silica is in the range of 0 to 0.99, which indicates the death of one person per thousand people. Also, in this industry, the risk of dying from lung cancer was 15 per thousand people.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that the average concentration of crystalline silica in all occupational groups exceeded the permissible occupational exposure limit of 0.025 mg.m-3 recommended by the Occupational Health Committee of Iran. Additionally, the estimated risk of death due to silicosis and lung cancer is also higher than the acceptable risk level. Therefore, the implementation of control measures against exposure to silica is highly recommended.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Occupational Health
Received: 2023/06/21 | Accepted: 2023/07/18 | Published: 2023/10/29
Received: 2023/06/21 | Accepted: 2023/07/18 | Published: 2023/10/29
References
1. Pa FC, Abdullah C, Fazlul B, editors. Review of extraction of silica from agricultural wastes using acid leaching treatment. Advanced Materials Research; 2013: Trans Tech Publ. [DOI]
2. Wray RAL, Sauro F. An updated global review of solutional weathering processes and forms in quartz sandstones and quartzites. Earth-Science Reviews. 2017;171:520-57. [DOI]
3. OSHA. Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica-review of health effects literature and preliminary quantitative risk assessment. OSHA Publication Washington, DC, USA. 2010:1-399. [URL]
4. WHO. IARC Monographs, volume 68: silica-summary of data reported and evaluation. 2000. [Google Scholar]
5. Cheepsattayakorn A, Cheepsattayakorn R. Silicosis-Associated Tuberculosis: Management and Control. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2022;6(2):125-9. [Google Scholar]
6. Poinen-Rughooputh S, Rughooputh MS, Guo Y, Rong Y, Chen W. Occupational exposure to silica dust and risk of lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. BMC public health. 2016;16(1):1-17. [DOI] [PMID] []
7. IARC. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: silica, some silicates, coal dust, and paraaramid fibrils. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1997;68. [URL]
8. Greenberg MI, Waksman J, Curtis J. Silicosis: a review. Disease-a-Month. 2007;53(8):394-416. [DOI] [PMID]
9. WHO. Elimination of silicosis. GOHNET Newsletter. www who int/entity/occupational_health/publications/newsletter/gohnet12e pdf. 2007. [URL]
10. Roth GA, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1736-88. [DOI] [PMID]
11. Jindal SK. Silicosis in India: past and present. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine. 2013;19(2):163-8. [DOI] [PMID]
12. Kauppinen T, Toikkanen J, Pedersen D, Young R, Ahrens W, Boffetta P, et al. Occupational exposure to carcinogens in the European :union:. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2000;57(1):10-8.
http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2009/indexeh.htm [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. Chinese annual health statistical report Beijing: Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China 2009. [URL]
14. NIOSH. Health Effects of Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2002. [Google Scholar]
15. Iran Ministry of Health & Medical Education. A Guide to Occupational Health in Foundries Islamic Republic of Iran Ministry of Health and Medical Education Enviromental and Occupational Health Center; 2012. [URL]
16. Andersson L, Bryngelsson IL, Ohlson CG, Nayström P, Lilja BG, Westberg H. Quartz and dust exposure in Swedish iron foundries. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. 2008;6(1):9-18. [DOI] [PMID]
17. Kuo CT, Chiu FF, Bao BY, Chang TY. Determination and prediction of respirable dust and crystalline-free silica in the taiwanese foundry industry. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;15(10):2105. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Omidianidost A, Ghasemkhani M, Azari MR, Golbabaei F. Assessment of occupational exposure to dust and crystalline silica in foundries. Tanaffos. 2015;14(3):208-12. [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Yassin A, Yebesi F, Tingle R. Occupational exposure to crystalline silica dust in the United States, 1988-2003. Environmental health perspectives. 2005;113(3):255-60. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. NIOSH. Occupational Risk Assessment: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2017 [Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/riskassessment/default.html. [URL]
21. Steenland K, Attfield M, Boffetta P, Checkoway H, DeKlerk N, Koskela R. Exposure-response analysis and risk assessment for silica and silicosis mortality in a pooled analysis of six cohorts. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2002;59(11):723-8. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Rodricks JV, Brett SM, Wrenn GC. Significant risk decisions in federal regulatory agencies. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 1987;7(3):307-20. [DOI] [PMID]
23. Sherson D. Silicosis in the twenty first century. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd; 2002. p. 721-2. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Rice F, Park R, Stayner L, Smith R, Gilbert S, Checkoway H. Crystalline silica exposure and lung cancer mortality in diatomaceous earth industry workers: a quantitative risk assessment. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2001;58(1):38-45. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Azari MR, Rokni M, Salehpour S, MEHRABI YE, Jafari MJ, NASER MA, et al. Risk assessment of workers exposed to crystalline silica aerosols in the east zone of Tehran. 2009. [Google Scholar]
26. Omidianidost A, Ghasemkhani M, Kakooei H, Shahtaheri SJ, Ghanbari M. Risk assessment of occupational exposure to crystalline silica in small foundries in Pakdasht, Iran. Iranian journal of public health. 2016;45(1):70. [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Zarei F, R Azari M, Salehpour S, Khodakarim S, Kalantary S, Tavakol E. Exposure assessment of core making workers to respirable crystalline silica dust. Health and Safety at Work. 2017;7(1):1-8. [Google Scholar]
28. De Vuyst P, Camus P. The past and present of pneumoconioses. Current opinion in pulmonary medicine. 2000;6(2):151-6. [DOI] [PMID]
29. Leidel NA, Busch KA, Lynch JR. Occupational exposure sampling strategy manual: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Publication no. 77-173; 1977. [Google Books]
30. Andrews R, O'Connor PF. NIOSH manual of analytical methods (NMAM), 5th Edition. 5th ed. Washington D.C., USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2020. [Google Scholar]
31. Steenland K, Mannetje A, Boffetta P, Stayner L, Attfield M, Chen J, et al. Pooled exposure-response analyses and risk assessment for lung cancer in 10 cohorts of silica-exposed workers: an IARC multicentre study. Cancer Causes & Control. 2001;12(9):773-84. [DOI] [PMID]
32. Mohammadyan m, Rokni M, Islami S, Fazeli A. Evaluation of Workers' Exposure to Crystaline Silica Particles in Some Factories of Mazandaran Province. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2012;22(88):17-24. [Google Scholar]
33. Ayalp A, Myroniuk D. Evaluation of occupational exposure to free silica in Alberta foundries. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 1982;43(11):825-31. [DOI] [PMID]
34. Tong R, Cheng M, Ma X, Yang Y, Liu Y, Li J. Quantitative health risk assessment of inhalation exposure to automobile foundry dust. Environmental geochemistry and health. 2019;41(5):2179-93. [DOI] [PMID]
35. Chen W, Zhuang Z, Attfield M, Chen B, Gao P, Harrison J, et al. Exposure to silica and silicosis among tin miners in China: exposure-response analyses and risk assessment. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2001;58(1):31-7. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
36. ACGIH. The Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents & Biological Exposure Indices. Silica, Crystalline-Quartz. 7th ed. Cincinnati: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; 2001. [URL]
37. ACGIH. The Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents & Biological Exposure Indices: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; 2007. [URL]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
