Volume 3, Issue 4 (November 2024)
Health Science Monitor 2024, 3(4): 368-375 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hamdolahpour N, Behroozi-lak T, Sadeghpour S. The measurement of vaginal fluid creatinine aids in the diagnosis of preterm membrane rupture. Health Science Monitor 2024; 3 (4) :368-375
URL: http://hsm.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-204-en.html
URL: http://hsm.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-204-en.html
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
Abstract: (405 Views)
Background & Aims: Introduction: Pre-labour rupture of membranes is a critical obstetric condition, presenting an important contribution to maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic value of vaginal fluid creatinine in the identification of PROM.
Materials & Methods: In the present descriptive-analytical study, 150 pregnant women were recruited and randomly assigned to three groups: confirmed PROM (n=50), suspected PROM (n=50), and healthy controls (n=50). Vaginal fluid samples were collected and analyzed for creatinine concentration using the Jaffe technique. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 16, employing ANOVA and post hoc tests.
Results: Mean creatinine level of vaginal fluid was significantly higher in the PROM group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Tukey post hoc test showed significant creatinine level groupings between PROM cases and controls. Maternal age, gestational age, and fetal weight did not show a significant correlation with creatinine levels (p > 0.05). Creatinine testing demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the Fern test with a moderate correlation rate of 54%.
Conclusion: The measurement of creatinine in vaginal fluid is an inexpensive, quick, and dependable diagnostic test for PROM, which is superior to the Fern test. Vaginal creatinine testing may also enhance maternal and neonatal outcomes due to the timeliness and accuracy of early diagnosis of PROM.
Materials & Methods: In the present descriptive-analytical study, 150 pregnant women were recruited and randomly assigned to three groups: confirmed PROM (n=50), suspected PROM (n=50), and healthy controls (n=50). Vaginal fluid samples were collected and analyzed for creatinine concentration using the Jaffe technique. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 16, employing ANOVA and post hoc tests.
Results: Mean creatinine level of vaginal fluid was significantly higher in the PROM group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Tukey post hoc test showed significant creatinine level groupings between PROM cases and controls. Maternal age, gestational age, and fetal weight did not show a significant correlation with creatinine levels (p > 0.05). Creatinine testing demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the Fern test with a moderate correlation rate of 54%.
Conclusion: The measurement of creatinine in vaginal fluid is an inexpensive, quick, and dependable diagnostic test for PROM, which is superior to the Fern test. Vaginal creatinine testing may also enhance maternal and neonatal outcomes due to the timeliness and accuracy of early diagnosis of PROM.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2024/10/8 | Accepted: 2024/11/19 | Published: 2024/11/20
Received: 2024/10/8 | Accepted: 2024/11/19 | Published: 2024/11/20
References
1. Pasquier JC, Rabilloud M, Picaud JC, Ecochard R, Claris O, Gaucherand P, et al. A prospective population-based study of 598 cases of PPROM between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation: description, management, and mortality (DOMINOS cohort). European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2005;121(2):164-170. [DOI] [PMID]
2. Begum J, Samal SK, Ghose S, Niranjan G. Vaginal Fluid Urea and Creatinine in the Diagnosis of Premature Rupture of Membranes in Resource Limited Community Settings. Journal of Family and Reproductive Health. 2017;11(1):43-49. [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Park J, Lee SI, Norwitz ER. Non-invasive Testing for Rupture of the Fetal Membranes. Fetal and Maternal Healthcare US Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;13(3):13-16. [URL]
4. Begum J, Samal SK, Ghose S, Niranjan G. Vaginal Fluid Urea and Creatinine in the Diagnosis of Premature Rupture of Membranes in Resource Limited Community Settings. Journal of Family and Reproductive Health. 2017;11(1):43-49. [Google Scholar]
5. Kariman N, Hedayati M, Majd SA. The diagnostic power of cervico-vaginal fluid prolactin in the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2012;14(9):541-547. [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Eleje GU, Ezugwu EC, Eke AC, Ikechebelu JI, Ezebialu IU, et al. Accuracy and response time of dual biomarker model of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1/alpha fetoprotein (Amnioquick duo+) in comparison to placental alpha-microglobulin-1 test in diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2017;45(3):825-833. [DOI] [PMID]
7. Garg A, Jaiswal A. Evaluation and management of premature rupture of membranes: a review article. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e36320. [DOI]
8. Smith RP. A technic for the detection of rupture of the membranes: a review and preliminary report. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1976;48(2):172-176. [Google Scholar]
9. El-Messidi A, Cameron A. Diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes: inspiration from the past and insights for the future. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2010;32(2):561-569. [DOI] [PMID]
10. Dumont M, Carbonne B, Mestry J, Mihalache C, Massoud M, Bordes A. Premature preterm rupture of the membrane diagnosis in early pregnancy: PAMG-1 and IGFBP-1 detection in amniotic fluid with biochemical tests. Clinical Biochemistry. 2013;46(2):1816-1819. [DOI] [PMID]
11. Palacio M, Kühnert M, Berger R, Larios CL, Marcellin L. Meta-analysis of studies on biochemical marker tests for the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes: comparison of performance indexes. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(3):183-194. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Kariman N, Toloui H, Azarhous R, Alavi H, Jan-nesari SH. Diagnostic Values of Urea and Creatinine Values of Cervicovaginal Discharges in Determining of Premature Rupture of Membranes. Research in Medicine. 2010;33(2):222-227. [Google Scholar]
13. Ghasemi M, Jaami R, Alleyassin A, Ansaripour A. The value of urea, creatinine, prolactin, and beta sub-unit of human chorionic gonadotropin of vaginal fluid in the diagnosis of premature preterm rupture of membranes in pregnancy. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;13(3):62-66. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Shahin M, Raslan H. Comparative study of three amniotic fluid markers in premature rupture of membranes: prolactin, beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin, and alpha-fetoprotein. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2007;63(3):195-199. [DOI] [PMID]
15. Lockwood CJ, Senyei AE, Dische MR, Casal D, Shah KD, Thung SN. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. New England Journal of Medicine. 1991;325(9):669-674. [DOI] [PMID]
16. Kant K, Pratap J, Natu S. Urea and creatinine levels in vaginal fluid- a reliable marker for prelabour rupture of membranes. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2018;7(20):2456-2459. [DOI]
17. Caughey AB, Robinson JN, Norwitz ER. Contemporary diagnosis and management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;1(1):11-22. [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Sekhavat L, Firouzabadi RD, Mojiri P. Practicability of vaginal washing fluid creatinine level in detecting premature rupture of membranes. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2012;286(1):25-28. [DOI] [PMID]
19. Kim KW, Chung S, Chang M, Ak K, Bae D. Lactate dehydrogenase isoform activity mapping in patients with intra-amniotic infection. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;195(2):1045-1052. [DOI] [PMID]
20. Li HY, Chang TS. Vaginal fluid creatinine, human chorionic gonadotropin and alpha-fetoprotein levels for detecting premature rupture of membranes. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2000;63(2):686-690. [Google Scholar]
21. Gurbuz A, Karateke A. Vaginal fluid creatinine in premature rupture of membranes. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2004;85(3):270-271. [DOI] [PMID]
22. Gezer C, Ekin A, Golbasi C, Kocahakimoglu C, Bozkurt U, Dogan A. Use of urea and creatinine levels in vaginal fluid for the diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes and delivery interval after membrane rupture. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2017;30(7):772-778. [DOI] [PMID]
23. Zanjani MS, Haghighi L. Vaginal fluid creatinine for the detection of premature rupture of membranes. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2012;38(3):505-508. [DOI] [PMID]
24. Tiwari MP, Madhava S. Comparative analysis of four biomarkers in diagnosing premature rupture of membranes and their correlation with onset of labour. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;4(2):1070-1075. [DOI]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
