Volume 3, Issue 2 (April 2024)                   Health Science Monitor 2024, 3(2): 170-178 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Asgari E, Aqanaghad M, Hoseinzadeh R, Jodiery P, Saifloo M. Performance investigating of the reverse osmosis treatment system to the water supply in the hemodialysis center of Khoy city in 2022. Health Science Monitor 2024; 3 (2) :170-178
URL: http://hsm.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-149-en.html
Ph.D of Environmental Health Engineering, Department of Health, Khoy University of Medical Sciences, Khoy, Iran
Abstract:   (1240 Views)
Background & Aims: Ensuring the quality of water for hemodialysis is crucial for the safety of dialysis patients. In this study, we evaluated the suitability of water from the reverse osmosis (RO) system for the Khoy Hemodialysis Center, comparing it with the American Medical Equipment Administration (AAMI).
Materials & Methods: We collected laboratory data related to hemodialysis water samples. These experiments were carried out by the reference laboratory of Khoy Medical Sciences Faculty from 2021 to 2022. Parameters such as pH, total dissolved solids, hardness, nitrate, and various metals were analyzed using SPSS software. Then the results were compared with AAMI standards.
Results: The average concentrations of pH, total dissolved solids, total hardness, nitrate, calcium, magnesium, sodium, and potassium were determined to be 6.2 ppm, 7.8 ppm, 21 ppm, 0.27 ppm, 0.93 ppm, 3.8 ppm, 3.7 ppm, and 0.07 ppm, respectively. The average concentrations of aluminum, copper, zinc, lead, and arsenic were found to be 3.4 ppb, 2.6 ppb, 5 ppb, 3.7 ppb, and 4.8 ppb, respectively. Importantly, the average concentration of all variables was below the AAMI standard. Statistical analysis tests of Bivariate and Canonical correlation indicated that the removal rate of heavy metals in the RO system was independent of the removal rate of other impurities, such as total dissolved solids. Moreover, residual chlorine, coliform, and heterotrophic plate count were zero in all samples.
Conclusion: Urban water purification using the RO system significantly enhances water quality at the Khoy Hemodialysis Center, aligning it with AAMI standards. However, it is emphasized that continuous monitoring is indispensable to ensure the sustained efficiency of the system.
Full-Text [PDF 294 kb]   (776 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Health and Environment
Received: 2023/10/18 | Accepted: 2024/02/17 | Published: 2024/04/9

References
1. Moazzeni SS, Arani RH, Hasheminia M, Tohidi M, Azizi F, Hadaegh F. High incidence of chronic kidney disease among Iranian diabetic adults: using CKD-EPI and MDRD equations for estimated glomerular filtration rate. Diabetes and Metabolism Journal. 2021;45:97-684. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Mirjalili H, Dastgheib SA, Shaker SH, Bahrami R, Mazaheri M, Sadr-Bafghi SMH, et al. Proportion and mortality of Iranian diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, hypertension and cardiovascular disease patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders. 2021;20:905-17. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Hilinski EG, Almodovar AAB, Silva FPdL, Pinto TdJA, Bugno A. Is dialysis water a safe component for hemodialysis treatment in São Paulo State, Brazil? Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020;56:e17835;1-9. [DOI]
4. Sola L, Levin NW, Johnson DW, Pecoits-Filho R, Aljubori HM, Chen Y, et al. Development of a framework for minimum and optimal safety and quality standards for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney International Supplements. 2021;(1)10:55-62. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Abbaszadeh M, Mosaferi M, Firouzi P, Abedpour MA, Sheykholeslami S. Evaluation of physicochemical and microbial quality control of Hemodialysis machines water in Hospitals. Depiction of Health. 2021;12(1):12-23. [DOI]
6. Abualhasan M, Basim A, Sofan S, Al-Atrash M. Quality of water used in Palestinian hemodialysis centers. Public Health. 2018;165:136-41. [DOI] [PMID]
7. Kermani M, Rezaei Kalantari R, Hashemi M. The concentration of heavy metals in water entering the dialysis machine Imam Ali Bojnurd in 2015. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2017;9(1):7-13. [DOI]
8. Abedi Koupaei J. Evaluation of Heavy Metals Concentration in Water Entering the Dialysis Machines of Shahid Beheshti Hospital of Qorveh. Zanko Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;21(68):65-72. [Google Scholar]
9. Morghad T, Hassaine H, Boutarfi Z, Gaouar S, Bellifa S, Meziani Z. Bacteriological water quality and biofilm formation in the treatment system of the hemodialysis unit in Tlemcen, Algeria. Seminars in Dialysis. 2020; Wiley Online Library. [DOI] [PMID]
10. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, Ollenschläger G, Phillips S, van der Wees P, et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2012;156(7):525-31. [DOI] [PMID]
11. Baseri A, Dehghani R, Soleimani A, Hasanbeigi O, Pourgholi M, Ahaki A, et al. Water Quality Investigation of the Hemodialysis Instruments in Kashan Akhavan Hospital During Oct.-Nov. 2011. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment. 2013;6(2):145-54. [Google Scholar]
12. Alizadeh M, Bazrafshan E, Jafari Mansoorian H, Rajabizadeh A. Microbiological and chemical indicators of water used in Hemodialysis centers of hospitals affiliated to Zahedan University of medical sciences, 2012. Health and Development Journal. 2013;2(3):182-91. [Google Scholar]
13. Vakili B, Shahmoradi B, Nouri B, Nouri A, Zandsalimi Y. Assessing biological and chemical indicators of water used in Dialysis Ward of one of the Sanandaj hospitals. Environment and Water Engineering. 2016;2(3):247-56. [Google Scholar]
14. Carvalho GC, Dua K, Gupta G, Bugno A, Pinto TdJA. Reflection about the hemodialysis water microbiological quality in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2022;58. [DOI]
15. Chaoui L, Chouati T, Zalegh I, Mhand RA, Mellouki F, Rhallabi N. Identification and assessment of antimicrobial resistance bacteria in a hemodialysis water treatment system. Journal of Water and Health. 2022;20(2):441-9. [DOI] [PMID]
16. Anversa L, Romani CD, Caria ES, Saeki EK, Nascentes GA, Garbelotti M, et al. Quality of dialysis water and dialysate in haemodialysis centres: Highlight for occurrence of non‐fermenting gram‐negative bacilli. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2022;132(4):3416-3429. [DOI] [PMID]
17. Pirsaheb M, Naderi S, Lorestani B, Khosravi T, Sharafi K. Evaluating the Trend of Heavy Metals Concentration Changes in Feed Water to Reverse Osmosis, Feed and Permeate Water of Dialysis Instrument of Hemodialysis Patients-A (Case Study: Kermanshah Hospitals). 2015;24(4):71-78. [Google Scholar]
18. Ibrahim S. Quality of care assessment and adherence to the international guidelines considering dialysis, water treatment, and protection against transmission of infections in university hospital‐based dialysis units in Cairo, Egypt. Hemodialysis International. 2010;14(1):61-7. [DOI] [PMID]
19. Importance and role of water purification systems for hemodialysis units. Rahavard Salamat Journal. 2017;3(2):8-18. [URL]
20. Naderi B, Attar HM, Mohammadi F. Evaluation of Some Chemical Parameters of Hemodialysis Water: A Case Study in Iran. Environmental Health Insights. 2022;16:1-8. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Wimalawansa SJ. The role of ions, heavy metals, fluoride, and agrochemicals: critical evaluation of potential aetiological factors of chronic kidney disease of multifactorial origin (CKDmfo/CKDu) and recommendations for its eradication. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2016;38(3):639-78. [DOI] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Health Science Monitor

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb