Volume 5, Issue 1 (February 2026)                   Health Science Monitor 2026, 5(1): 24-31 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Patel H, Katewa A, Champanari B, Shah P, Patel D, Patel K, et al . Socioeconomic and Demographic Predictors of Parental Awareness in a Clinical Cohort of Congenital Heart Disease in India. Health Science Monitor 2026; 5 (1) :24-31
URL: http://hsm.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-284-en.html
Department of CVTS, U. N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Center, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Abstract:   (27 Views)
Background Congenital heart disease is the most prevalent congenital disorder all over the world and leads to the death of infants in India. Socioeconomic and demographic factors contribute to the inequality of congenital heart disease outcomes despite the improvements in the accuracy of the diagnostic procedures and surgical interventions. The objective of the research was to determine the influence of parental education level, household income, residence, and awareness on early diagnosis, surgical treatment, and the postoperative process of pediatric patients with congenital heart disease.
Methods A retrospective study design was used to study the data of 996 children with structural congenital heart disease who were treated at a tertiary care center. The delay in diagnosis and low knowledge of congenital heart disease were identified as predictors with the help of multivariate logistic regression.
Results Low maternal education (OR: 3.67, p < 0.001), low household income (OR: 2.53, p = 0.014), and rural residence (OR: 1.69, p = 0.006) were significant predictors of lack of awareness regarding antenatal detection of congenital heart disease at 18-20 weeks. Even though 61.6% of patients received single-stage surgery, 81.7% had the option to follow up after surgery. The level of awareness of prenatal detectability of congenital heart disease amounted to 11.05% of the parents.
Conclusions Socioeconomic and geographic disparities are some of the factors in the delay of congenital heart disease diagnosis and surgical treatment. The incorporation of congenital heart disease screening awareness into antepartum programs, increased coverage under insurance plans, and multilingual communication methods are key to improving pediatric cardiac outcomes in India.
Full-Text [PDF 441 kb]   (42 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Advanced Sciences and Technologies in Public Health
Received: 2025/12/3 | Accepted: 2026/02/3 | Published: 2026/02/11

References
1. Animasahun BA, Adekunle MO, Kusimo OY. Time to diagnosis, socioeconomic, and clinical features of patients with congenital heart diseases in a teaching hospital in Nigeria. Journal of Public Health and Emergency. 2018;2(4).doi: 10.21037/jphe.2018.04.01. [DOI]
2. Klein JH, Donofrio MT. Untangling the complex associations between socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and prenatal detection and outcomes in congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024;11(5):155.doi: 10.3390/jcdd11050155. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Balat MS, Sahu SK. Congenital Heart Disease: factor affecting it and role of RBSK India ling with situation. International journal of community Medicin and public Health5. 2018;10:4437-40.doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20183990. [DOI]
4. Xiang L, Su Z, Liu Y, Zhang X, Li S, Hu S, et al. Effect of family socioeconomic status on the prognosis of complex congenital heart disease in children: an observational cohort study from China. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018;2(6):430-9.doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30100-7. [DOI] [PMID]
5. Chowdhury D, Elliott PA, Asaki SY, Amdani S, Nguyen QT, Ronai C, et al. Addressing disparities in pediatric congenital heart disease: a call for equitable health care. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(13):e032415.doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032415. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Pan F, Li J, Lou H, Li J, Jin Y, Wu T, et al. Geographical and socioeconomic factors influence the prevalence of congenital heart disease at birth: a population-based cross-sectional study in eastern China. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022;47(11):101341.doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101341. [DOI] [PMID]
7. Mamatha S, Hemapriya L, Mahesh M, Madhumitha M. Profile and outcome of pregnancy with congenital heart diseases: a retrospective study from a South Indian tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology.. 2018;7(3):883-8.doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180508. [DOI]
8. Knowles RL, Ridout D, Crowe S, Bull C, Wray J, Tregay J, et al. Ethnic and socioeconomic variation in incidence of congenital heart defects. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102(6):496-502.doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311143. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Nair A, Radhakrishnan S. Status of Antenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Defects in a Northern Indian Population and Factors Influencing it. Journal of Fetal Medicine. 2017;4(03):119-24.doi: 10.1007/s40556-017-0134-2. [DOI]
10. Iyer KS, Sivalingam S. Congenital heart disease in low-and middle-income countries: can India show the way?. IJTCVS. 2025;41(6):657-63.doi: 10.1007/s12055-025-01969-w. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Meshram RM, Gajimwar VS. Prevalence, profile, and pattern of congenital heart disease in Central India: A prospective, observational study. Nigerian Journal of Cardiology. 2018;15(1):45-9.doi: 10.4103/njc.njc_22_17. [DOI] [PMID]
12. Tran M, Miner A, Merkel C, Sakurai K, Woon J, Ayala J, et al. Sociodemographic profile associated with congenital heart disease among infants< 1 year old. J Pediatr Nurs.. 2023;73:e618-23.doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.11.007. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Dhar M, Bhat N, Kaeley N, Ahmad S, Rawat A. Prevalence and Demographic Profile of Patients with Adult Congenital Cardiac Disease in the State of Uttrakhand-A Recently Created North Indian State. Journal of Clinical and Preventive Cardiology. 2018;7(4):128-31.doi: 10.4103/JCPC.JCPC_14_18. [DOI]
14. Miao Q, Dunn S, Wen SW, Lougheed J, Reszel J, Lavin Venegas C, et al. Neighbourhood maternal socioeconomic status indicators and risk of congenital heart disease. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):72.doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03512-8. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Saxena A. Congenital heart disease in India: a status report. Indian J. Pediatr.2005;72(7):595-8.do.i: 10.1007/BF02724185 [DOI] [PMID]
16. Harikesh H, Reddy VS, Anand S, Shankar G. Sociodemographic profile and pattern of congenital heart disease in referred children at tertiary cardiac centre-An observational study. Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research. 2024;13(1):40-3.doi: 10.4103/jcsr.jcsr_224_22. [DOI]
17. Chimoriya R, Chimoriya R, Shrestha M, Shrestha S, Shah K, Lama L, et al. Congenital Heart Disease among Children Undergoing Echocardiography in the Department of Pediatrics of Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc.2024;62(272):257_60.doi: 10.31729/jnma.8557. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Jain PK, Lazarus M, Tiwari A, Athwani VK. Prevalence and Pattern of Congenital Heart Disease in Pediatric Population-A Study from Central India. Int J Recent Surg Med Sci.. 2022;9(1):39-44.doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1751085. [DOI]
19. Odo HN. The Relationship Between Congenital Heart Disease and Infant Mortality in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Omaha (NE): University of Nebraska Medical Center; 2023. [Google Scholar]
20. Nair SM, Zheleva B, Dobrzycka A, Hesslein P, Sadanandan R, Kumar RK. A population health approach to address the burden of congenital heart disease in Kerala, India. Glob. Heart. 2021;16(1):71.doi: 10.5334/gh.1034. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 All Rights Reserved | Health Science Monitor

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb